Method and apparatus of an input resistance of a passive mixer to broaden the input matching bandwidth of a common source/gate LNA

ABSTRACT

A common-source Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) comprises a first spiral inductor coupled to a source of a first transistor, a second spiral inductor coupled to a drain of a second transistor, and a third inductor connecting the first transistor to the second transistor. The third inductor is configurable to enable a first capacitance to be coupled in parallel to form a bandpass filter. The first spiral inductor is configurable to enable a second capacitance to be coupled in parallel to form a resonant circuit. A variation of the LNA further includes a drain of a third transistor coupled to a gate of a fourth transistor with a first width, a source of the third transistor coupled to the resonant circuit, and an oscillator clock configured to operate at a first frequency that enables the third transistor, wherein the third transistor presents a first impedance to the resonant circuit, causing the resonant circuit to have a first bandwidth.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/357,566, filed Nov. 21, 2016, entitled, “Method and Apparatus of an Input Resistance of a Passive Mixer to Broaden the Input Matching Bandwidth of a Common Source-Gate LNA,” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/016,714, filed Feb. 5, 2016, entitled, “Method and Apparatus of an Input Resistance of a Passive Mixer to Broaden the Input Matching Bandwidth of a Common Source-Gate LNA,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,503,032, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/108,312, filed Dec. 16, 2013, entitled, “Method and Apparatus of an Input Resistance of a Passive Mixer to Broaden the Input Matching Bandwidth of a Common Source-Gate LNA,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,287,836, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/312,806, filed Dec. 6, 2011, entitled, “Method and Apparatus of an Input Resistance of a Passive Mixer to Broaden the Input Matching Bandwidth of a Common Source/Gate LNA,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,626,106, which is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/312,820, entitled, “An Injection Locked Divider with Injection Point Located at a Tapped Inductor” filed on Dec. 6, 2011, which was invented by the same inventor as the present application, each of the above-referenced applications incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has allotted a spectrum of bandwidth in the 60 GHz frequency range (57 to 64 GHz). The Wireless Gigabit Alliance (WiGig) is targeting the standardization of this frequency band that will support data transmission rates up to 7 Gbps. Integrated circuits, formed in semiconductor die, offer high frequency operation in this millimeter wavelength range of frequencies. Some of these integrated circuits utilize Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS), Silicon-Germanium (SiGe) or GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) technology to form the dice in these designs. At 60 GHz, the interface issues between the LNA and the mixer are presented.

CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) is the primary technology used to construct integrated circuits. N-channel devices and P-channel devices (MOS device) are used in this technology which uses fine line technology to consistently reduce the channel length of the MOS devices. Current channel lengths are 40 nm, the power supply of VDD equals 1.2V and the number of layers of metal levels can be 8 or more.

Cost is a driving force in electronic products. Integration of circuit has allowed many more devices into the die. In addition, massive computation is typically requires when operating wireless systems. This has forced analog designers to introduce their circuit techniques into 8 layer metal CMOS processes more geared for digital logic manipulation rather than analog functions. The design of high speed analog circuits (60 GHz) in the 8 layer 40 nm CMOS process is a difficult task that requires innovation, careful design and analysis.

Conventional techniques in high frequency circuit design can unnecessarily waste energy. Any technology being pushed to the limit, as in the design of 60 GHz receiver frond-ends that includes an LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) and mixer, makes these energy losses more pronounced. These losses influence target objectives and can cause the chip or die to fail meeting the specifications. New circuit techniques are required to reduce these energy losses and allow the circuit to achieve 60 Ghz operation in the WiGig specification.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Various embodiments and aspects of the inventions will be described with reference to details discussed below, and the accompanying drawings will illustrate the various embodiments. The following description and drawings are illustrative of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the present invention. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to provide a concise discussion of embodiments of the present inventions.

One of the embodiments of the disclosure is a common source LNA interfacing to a mixer where the mixer responds to input current signals generated by the output of the LNA. An output signal spectrum is developed across the resonant circuit load of the LNA and is coupled to a mixer. The signal spectrum of the input signal is amplified and generates an output signal spectrum that is carried within the current signals being applied to the mixer. The voltage output of the LNA's load is translated to a current output that is applied to the input of the mixer. These input current signals apply the energy associated with the current directly into the mixer to minimize the overall power dissipation.

Another embodiment uses a series peaking inductor coupling the cascode devices of the LNA together. The area occupied by the inductors are orders of magnitude larger that the area occupied by the devices in the LNA. A device represents a CMOS transistor where the transistor can be either P or N-type channel transistor. In addition, the physical displacement between the upper cascode device and the lower cascode device of the LNA can be quite large. A series peaking inductor formed from a wide metal layer is used to couple the drain of the lower cascode device to the source of the upper cascode device. A capacitance can be added to the wide trace of the inductor to form a bandpass filter in order to pass those frequencies of interest.

Another embodiment of the invention is the adjustment of the width of the top cascode device with respect to the width of the bottom input device in the cascode LNA to adjust the optimum (NF) Noise Figure and the center frequency of the resonant circuit to the desired frequency of operation. The NF can be further improved 0.16 dB by reducing the width of the upper cascode device below the width of the lower cascode device. In addition, the center carrier frequency of the LNA is decreased.

An additional embodiment uses the impedance of the mixer to reduce the Q (or quality factor) of the resonant circuit. By reducing the Q, the bandwidth of the receiver is increased. The adjustment of the width of the top cascode device and the load of the impedance of the mixer reduces the Q and eliminates the need for either a capacitive or resistive array to perform this function thereby reducing the introduction of unnecessary parasitic elements. This allows the receiver to meet the requirements for the WiGig initiative at a reduced power.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Please note that the drawings shown in this specification may not necessarily be drawn to scale and the relative dimensions of various elements in the diagrams are depicted schematically. The inventions presented here may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be through and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. In other instances, well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiment of the invention. Like identifiers or numbers refer to like elements in the diagrams.

FIG. 1a depicts a common source device stage in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 1b shows a high frequency model of the common source MOS device in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 2a illustrates a common gate device stage in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 2b shows a high frequency model of the common gate MOS device in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 3a presents a common source device stage with a cascode structure in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 3b shows a common gate device stage with a cascode structure in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 3c presents a block diagram of the LNA in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 4a illustrates a common source device stage with a cascode structure using a peaking inductor in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 4b shows a common gate device stage with a cascode structure using a peaking inductor in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 4c depicts a common source device stage with a cascode structure using a peaking inductor and a switched resistive array to adjust the bandwidth of the resonant circuit in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 4d presents a common gate device stage with a cascode structure using a peaking inductor and a switched resistive array to adjust the bandwidth of the resonant circuit in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 4e depicts a common source device stage with a cascode structure using a peaking inductor and a switched capacitive array to adjust the center frequency of the resonant circuit in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 4f shows a common gate device stage with a cascode structure using a peaking inductor and a switched capacitive array to adjust the center frequency of the resonant circuit in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 5a presents the graphical results of the Noise Figure of an LNA for two different width ratios of the upper cascode device to the lower cascode device versus frequency of WCS (Worst Case Slow) operation in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 5b illustrates the graphical results of the Noise Figure of an LNA for two different widths of the upper cascode device to the lower cascode device versus frequency of BCF (Best Case Fast) operation in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 5c presents the graphical results of the forward gain of an LNA for two different widths of the upper cascode device to the lower cascode device versus frequency of WCS (Worst Case Slow) operation in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 5d illustrates the graphical results of the forward gain of an LNA for two different widths of the upper cascode device to the lower cascode device versus frequency of BCF (Best Case Fast) operation in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 6a shows a portion of a conventional Gilbert mixer.

FIG. 6b illustrates a block diagram of the LNA, Quadrature oscillator and I and Q mixers in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 7a presents the circuit of the LNA, Quadrature oscillator outputs and I and Q mixers in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 7b depicts the measured gain response of the common source LNA, Quadrature oscillator outputs and I and Q mixers in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 8a illustrates the physical layout of the inductors and devices in the LNA in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 8b illustrates the cross sectional view along A-A′ in FIG. 8a in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 8c presents a via stack in the CMOS process in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The inventions presented in this specification can be used in various high frequency system designs. Some of the basic circuits for an analog amplifier include the common source and common gate structures as illustrated in FIG. 1a and FIG. 2a , respectively. The common source configuration of a LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) in FIG. 1a illustrates a voltage source 1-2, a voltage in series with a resistor, that can represent the output of an antenna or another source of an extracted signals. The output 1-1 of the voltage source 1-2 couples to the input of the gate of M₁ by the gate inductance L₁. The voltage source 1-2 provides the input frequency spectrum to the receiver. The source of M₁ is coupled to ground by the inductor L₂. At DC, the impedance of the inductor L₂ is zero causing the source of M₁ to be coupled to ground (GRD or VSS). This configuration is known as the common source. The drain of device M₁ is coupled to VDD by a load 1-3, in this case, the inductor L₃ and the output out₁ is provided at the drain of M₁.

A small signal model of the common source is provided in FIG. 1b . The gate (g), source (s) and drain (d) of the device are labeled. Between the gate and source is the gate to source capacitance C_(gs). A current source g_(m)V_(gs) between the source and drain is controlled by the voltage between the gate and source V_(gs). The input is applied at 1-1 while the output is provided at out₁. The voltage source and any parasitic resistances (for example, the resistance of the inductors) and several of the capacitances known in the art (i.e. C_(gd)) are not illustrated to simply the diagram. Finally, the load on the drain of the device is the parallel combination of the capacitance, C₁, at the drain and the inductance L₃ which is a resonant circuit 1-4. The resistance, not illustrated, is in parallel with the capacitance and inductance completing the parallel RLC tank circuit or resonant circuit of the LNA. The load or resonant circuit for the remaining cases of the LNA's are similar and will generally not be explicitly shown.

The common gate configuration of a LNA in FIG. 2a illustrates a voltage source 1-2, a voltage in series with a resistor, that can represent the output of an antenna or another source of an extracted signal also called the input signal spectrum. The voltage source 1-2 couples to the source 2-1 of M₂. The source is coupled to ground by the inductor L₅. The gate of M₂ is coupled to an AC ground by the capacitor C₂ and to the power supply VDD by the inductor L₄. At DC, the impedance of the inductor L₄ is zero causing the gate of M₂ to be coupled to a power supply (VDD). In general, the inductance of L₄ can be minimized, and in some cases, the inductor L₄ can be replaced by a short. The configuration in FIG. 2a is known as the common gate. The drain of device M₂ is coupled to VDD by the inductor L₆. The output of the circuit is available at out₂.

A small signal model of the common gate is provided in FIG. 2b . The gate (g), source (s) and drain (d) of the device are labeled. The input is applied at 2-1 while the output is provided at out₂. Between the gate and source is the gate to source capacitance C_(gs). A current source g_(m)V_(gs) between the source and drain is controlled by the voltage between the gate and source V_(gs). The inductor L₅ is between the source and ground. The voltage source and any parasitic resistances (for example, the resistance of the inductors) and several of the capacitances known in the art (i.e. C_(gd)) are not illustrated to simply the diagram. Finally, the load on the drain of the device is the parallel combination of the capacitance, C₃, at the drain and the inductance L₆. FIG. 2b illustrates that the current gain of the common gate approaches one.

FIG. 3a presents a cascode common gate structure. The cascode structure comprises the two stacked devices, M₄ and M₃, and couples to VSS and VDD through the inductors, L₈ and L₉. Typically, these inductors can occupy an area 50 um on a side while the devices can be incorporated into an area of Sum on a side. The area occupied by these inductors compared to the area occupied by the devices can be two orders of magnitude larger. This illustrates that the placement of the inductors play a very important role in determining just how close the devices in the cascode structure can be placed next to one another. The input is applied at in₃ through the inductor L₇ to the gate of M₄ while the output is provided at out₃. Quite often, the two devices of the cascode cannot be placed next to each other. Thus, a metal interconnect may be required to couple the drain of M₄ to the source of M₃. This interconnect is represented by the resistance R₃. This resistance introduces losses and can decrease the gain of the circuit.

In FIG. 3a , the cascode structure provides several advantages including; better isolation between input and output nodes, a high output impedance, and a higher bandwidth. A current mirror is formed by devices M_(b1) and M₄ controlled by I_(bias1). The resistor R₁ acts as a low pass filter to stabilize the voltage from the diode connected device M_(b1) and applies the voltage to the gate of device M₄. The device M₄ is configured in a common source configuration while the device M₃ is in a common gate configuration. The voltage at node 3-1 is nearly constant reducing the miller feedback capacitance for the device M₄. Because the miller capacitance is reduced in this circuit, the cascode configuration allows a higher bandwidth.

FIG. 3b presents a cascode common gate structure. The cascode structure comprises the two stacked devices, M₆ and M₅, and couples to VSS and VDD through the inductors, L₁₁ and L₁₂. A current mirror is formed by devices M_(b2) and M₆ controlled by I_(bias2). The resistor R₂ acts as a low pass filter to stabilize the voltage from the diode connected device M_(b2) and applies the voltage to the gate of device M₆. As mentioned earlier, the placement of the inductors play a very important role in determining just how close these devices in the cascode structure can be placed next to one another. Quite often, these devices cannot be placed next to each other. Thus, a metal interconnect, modeled by the resistor R₄, couples the drain of M₆ to the source of M₅. This interconnect is represented by the resistance R₄.

In FIG. 3b , the input is applied at in₄ through the inductor L₁₀ to the source of M₆ while the output is provided at out₄. In general, the inductance of L₁₀ can be minimized, and in some cases, the inductor L₁₀ can be replaced by a short. The cascode structure provides several advantages including; better isolation between input and output nodes, a high output impedance, and a higher bandwidth. The device M₆ is configured as a common gate while the device M₃ is also in a common gate configuration. This circuit can provide a current gain approaching one.

FIG. 3c illustrates the block diagram of the LNA. A signal “from a source” that could be an antenna, the electrical output of a fiber network, or a very weak signal is amplified by the LNA and provided at its output out. The LNA is optimized to keep the noise figure low while also providing a gain to the weak signal.

FIG. 4a presents a second cascode common source structure. The cascode structure comprises the two stacked devices, M₈ and M₇, and couples to VSS and VDD through the inductors, L₁₃ and L₁₅. A current mirror is formed by devices M_(b3) and M₈ controlled by I_(bias3) and applied to the gate of device M₈. The resistor R₅ acts as a low pass filter to stabilize the voltage from the diode connected device M_(b3). The area occupied by the inductors can be two orders of magnitude larger than the area occupied by the devices. Often these two devices cannot be placed next to each other. Thus, a metal interconnect is used to couple the drain of M₈ to the source of M₇. This interconnect, if modeled as a resistor, can decrease the gain of the circuit. By increasing the width of this metallic interconnect, the resistance is decreased at the expense of increased capacitance. However, another feature of this interconnect becomes more prominent: its self-inductance, L₁₆. Thus, FIG. 4a illustrates the substitution of the resistor model of R₃ in FIG. 3a by the inductor L₁₆. This inductance can now be used as a peaking inductor which resonates with the corresponding capacitance of the interconnect and devices loading this interconnect. The function of the peaking inductor and capacitive load forms a band-pass filter which is adjusted to operate at 60 GHz. Thus, although the placement of the two cascode devices are displaced from one another on the die, the peaking inductor can minimize the loss of the resistive component in the interconnect between the cascode devices and provide a band-pass function.

In FIG. 4a , the input is applied at in₅ and arrives at the gate of M₈ through the inductor L₁₄ while the output is provided at out₅. In general, the inductance of L₁₄ can be minimized, and in some cases depending on the layout, the inductor L₁₄ can be replaced by a short. A current mirror is formed by devices M_(b3) and M₈ controlled by I_(bias3). The cascode structure provides several advantages including; better isolation between input and output nodes, a high output impedance, and a higher bandwidth. The device M₈ is configured as a common source while the device M₇ is in a common gate configuration.

FIG. 4b presents a cascode common gate structure. The cascode structure comprises the two stacked devices, M₁₀ and M₉, and couples to VSS and VDD through the inductors, L₁₇ and L₁₉. A current mirror is formed by devices M_(b4) and M₁₀ controlled by I_(bias4). The resistor R₆ acts as a low pass filter to stabilize the voltage from the diode connected device M_(b4). As mentioned earlier, the placement of the inductors play a very important role in determining just how close these devices in the cascode structure can be placed next to one another. Quite often, these devices cannot be placed next to each other. The interconnect, if modeled as a resistor, can decrease the gain of the circuit. By increasing the width of this metallic interconnect, the resistance is decreased at the expense of increased capacitance. However, as before, another feature of this interconnect becomes more prominent: its self-inductance, L₂₀. Thus, a metal interconnect, previously modeled as a resistor R₄ in FIG. 3b , is now modeled as the inductor L₂₀. This inductance can now be used as a peaking inductor which resonates with the corresponding capacitance of the interconnect and devices loading this interconnect. Thus, although the placement of the two cascode devices are displaced from one another on the die, the peaking inductor can minimize the loss of the resistive component in the interconnect between the cascode devices and provide a band-pass function that can be adjusted to operate at 60 GHz.

In FIG. 4b , the input is applied at in₆ and arrives at the source of M₁₀ through the inductor L₁₈ while the output is provided at out₆. In general, the inductance of L₁₈ can be minimized, and in some cases depending on the layout, the inductor L₁₈ can be replaced by a short. A current mirror is formed by devices M_(b4) and M₁₀ controlled by I_(bias4). The cascode structure provides several advantages including; better isolation between input and output nodes, a high output impedance, and a higher bandwidth. The device M₁₀ is configured as a common gate while the device M₉ is also in a common gate configuration.

Ideally, the LNA would like to pass all frequencies equally over the targeted spectrum range from 57 Ghz to 64 GHz and block all other frequencies. However this condition is very difficult to achieve. Typically, a resonant circuit (comprising an inductor, capacitor and resistance) is also known as an RLC tuned circuit. The response of a resonant circuit is measured near the center frequency ω_(c) of the RLC resonant circuit. The bandwidth B is given as B=(ω_(c))/Q. The term Q is known as the quality factor.

As Q is decreased, the bandwidth of the resonant circuit increases while the gain decreases. This allows a resonant circuit to be adjusted so the bandwidth covers the desired spectrum range and the LNA can amplify any signal within the bandwidth, but the gain of the LNA has been decreased while the noise increased. On the other hand, as Q is increased, the bandwidth of the resonant circuit decreases while the gain increases. This creates a very selective bandpass circuit where only a portion of the desired spectrum would be captured.

The resistance R in the parallel RLC resonant circuit can control the value of Q according to the relation

$Q = {R{\sqrt{\frac{C}{L}}.}}$ The parasitic portion of R in FIG. 4c is given by R_(a) plus any dynamic resistance that are switched into the resonant circuit while the parasitic capacitance C is given by C_(a). As the R decreases, Q decreases. A resistive array formed by R₇ and R₈ can be switched into the RLC resonant circuit by enabling switches S₁ and S₂ (as shown by the arrows) to provide a dynamic resistance adjustment to the RLC resonant circuit in FIG. 4c . The switch S₁ or S₂ can be an MOS device that is enabled (to provide a path) and can couple the resistance of R₇ or R₈ into the parallel RLC resonant circuit. When the resistive array is enabled to place either or both R₇ or R₈ in parallel with R_(a), the resistance of the resonant circuit decreases and decreases the Q thereby increasing the bandwidth.

The common gate cascade LNA is illustrated in FIG. 4d . The parasitic capacitance C of the parallel RLC resonant circuit is given by C_(b). The parasitic portion of R is given by R_(b) in parallel with the two enabled switches S₃ and S₄ coupling R₉ or R₁₀ into the resonant circuit. The switches S₃ and S₄ become disabled (as shown by the arrows) to provide a dynamic resistance adjustment to the RLC resonant circuit in FIG. 4d . The resistors R₉ and R₁₀ are removed from being in in parallel with R_(b) causing the R in the RLC resonant circuit to increase. As the R increases, Q increases causing the bandwidth of the resonant circuit to decrease. Although only two resistors with two switches have been show, the number of switches and resistors can greater than two. In some cases, the resistance of the MOS devices forming the switches can provide the resistance while, in addition, the weight of the resistors can be binary weighted in value.

The capacitance C in the RLC resonant circuit can control the value of ω_(c), if R is very small or can be neglected, according to the relation

$\omega_{c} = {1/{\sqrt{LC}\;.}}$ Increasing C, decreases ω_(c) and vice versa. A capacitor array formed by C₄ and C₅ can be switched into the parallel RLC resonant circuit by enabling switches S₅ and S₆ (as shown by the arrows) to provide a dynamic capacitance adjustment to the RLC resonant circuit in FIG. 4e . The parasitic portion of C the RLC resonant circuit is given by C_(a) while the resistance R is given by the parasitic values R_(a). The capacitive switching array of the common source in FIG. 4e is provided by the two disabled switches S₅ and S₆ that can be enabled to place either or both C₄ or C₅ in parallel with C_(a) causing C to increase which decreases the ω_(c) The center frequency is then shifted to lower frequencies.

The common gate cascade LNA is illustrated in FIG. 4f . The capacitive switching array of the common gate is provided by the two enabled switches S₇ and S₈ that can be disabled (as shown by the arrows) to remove either or both C₆ or C₇ from being in in parallel with C_(b) causing the C in the RLC resonant circuit to decrease which increases the ω_(c). The center frequency is shifted to higher frequencies. Although only two capacitors with two switches have been show, the number of switches and capacitors can be varied while the weight of the capacitors can be binary weighted in value. Inserting/removing the capacitors by switch enablement/disablement provides the dynamic portion of the C in the RLC resonant circuit in FIG. 4e (common source) and FIG. 4f (common gate). Similar elements that have been identified with the same label in FIG. 4a , FIG. 4c and FIG. 4e are similar components while those with the same label in FIG. 4b , FIG. 4d and FIG. 4f are similar components.

The capacitive arrays occupy an area which introduces undesired capacitance into the network. The parasitic capacitances of the array elements introduces a dynamic capacitance C_(d) that can be comparable to the parasitic capacitance C_(a) of the resonant circuit causing the center frequency ω_(c)=1/√(L(C_(a)+C_(d))) to be controlled by the both terms C_(d) and C_(a). This additional dynamic capacitance can prevent the LNA from reaching the target frequency of 60 GHz. Similarly, the resistive arrays also introduce undesired parasitic capacitances because of their physical layout in the die. Thus, this parasitic capacitance introduced by the use of either the resistive or capacitive array makes the tuning or adjusting of the bandwidth and center frequency of the RLC resonant circuit more difficult for the WiGig bandwidth. The additional dynamic capacitance introduced into the parallel resonant circuit will make it more difficult for the circuit to operate at 60 GHz. A different inventive approach of adjusting the bandwidth and center frequency will be required.

One inventive approach in an attempt to overcome this barrier is to remove the capacitive array in FIG. 4e and the resistive array in FIG. 4c altogether thereby eliminating the additional dynamic capacitance of their layout. The requirement to adjust the bandwidth and center frequency of the RLC resonant circuit will be adjusted using two innovative embodiments.

The first innovative adjustment involves sizing the width of the upper cascade device while maintaining the lower cascade device at the same width. This adjustment of the upper cascade transistor width causes the center frequency of the parallel resonant RLC circuit to shift. As the width of the upper cascade device is decreased relative to the lower cascade device, the center frequency of the parallel resonant RLC circuit decreases.

The second innovative adjustment involves coupling the resonant circuit of the LNA to a switched capacitance circuit. The switched capacitor includes a switch whose gate is driven by a clock and where the switch drives a capacitive load. This switched capacitor circuit includes a mixer switch (MOS device) and capacitive load of the differential amplifier. The switched capacitor circuit places a resistance across the resonant circuit and is given by R=1/(Cf_(Θ)) where C is the capacitive gate load of the differential amplifier and f_(Θ) is the clock frequency of the quadrature oscillator. This resistive component can be used to adjust the Q or bandwidth of the parallel resonant RLC circuit of the LNA.

Then, in FIG. 4e , assuming that the capacitive array of C₄ and C₅ is removed, the width of the M₇ device can be adjusted with respect to the M₈ device to adjust the center frequency. The resistance of the switched capacitor can be used to adjust the Q or bandwidth of the parallel resonant RLC circuit. These size changes and adjustments are made final using simulation results to cover all process, temperature and voltage variations. After final layout and die fabrication, the operation of this inventive circuit technique has been confirmed by actual measurement.

The results of decreasing the channel width of M₇ with a parasitic capacitive load are provided in FIGS. 5a-d . The upper cascode device (M₇) in the common source LNA of FIG. 4e was varied in width while the width of the lower device (M₈) remained constant and the circuit was simulated to determine the NF (Noise Figure) and the Gain of the common source LNA. The dashed and solid lines in all of FIGS. 5a-d correspond to two different ratios of the width of the upper device (M7) to the width of the lower device (M8) or W_(M7)/W_(M8). These two ratios have been reduced to a common denominator of 8. The ratio W_(M7)/W_(M8) of the dashed line is 6/8 while that of the solid line corresponds to a ratio of 5/8.

FIG. 5a provides the NF at (WCS) Worst Case Slow Case (longer channel lengths, low power supply voltage and high temperature). The dotted line shows a minimum in the NF at about 68 GHz while the solid line shifts the minimum towards 63 GHz. Thus, as the upper device is reduced to a ratio of 5/8, the NF is reduced by 0.16 dB at 60 GHz when compared to the initial ratio of 6/8. FIG. 5b provides the NF results for the (BCF) Best Case Fast Case (shorter channel lengths, high power supply voltage and low temperature).

FIG. 5c provides the S21 or forward transmission coefficient (forward gain) at WCS. Note that the peak of the solid curve corresponding to a ratio of 5/8 is shifted to the left, decreasing the center frequency. At 60 GHz, the forward gain is increased by 3 dB. FIG. 5d provides the S21 results for the BCF case. Thus, for the common source LNA of FIG. 4e , assuming that the capacitive array of C₄ and C₅ is removed, the ratio of W_(M7)/W_(M8) was set to 5/8. Ideally, to achieve good linearity in the LNA requires that the upper device of the cascode have a width larger than the lower device. The upper device would introduce a smaller voltage drop and increase the available swing of the signal; however, the curves of FIG. 5a-d would then shift to the right increasing the NF and the center carrier frequency outside the desired range. The 1 db compression point is monitored to arrive at a design with an acceptable 1 db compression point where the NF is reduced, the gain is increased at 60 GHz and the bandwidth is shifted to lower frequencies.

A Gilbert mixer is illustrated in FIG. 6a comprising of the two devices M_(g1) and M_(g2) which are switched by the rf_(in) and rf_(in) signals, respectively. The drain of device M_(g1) is coupled to the common node 6-1 of the first mixer switch gated by the in-phase clock (Θ_(I) and its compliment). The drain of device M_(g2) is coupled to the common node 6-2 of the second mixer switch gated by the in-phase clock (Θ_(I) and its compliment). The outputs of the first mixer switch are combined with the outputs of the second mixer switch as illustrated to generate the if_(Iout′) signal. A load attached to each of the two outputs couples the Gilbert mixer to a power supply to supply energy to the circuit. The intermediate frequency contains the sum and difference frequency spectrum between the output signal spectrum carried by the rf_(in) and rf_(in) and the in-phase clock (Θ₁ and its compliment). Note that the energy carried by the output signal spectrum is only applied to the gates of M_(g1) and M_(g2) and this energy does not directly contribute to powering or providing energy to operate the mixer. If this energy could power the mixer, the energy usage of the mixer can potentially be minimized. A similar circuit is used to generate the if_(Qout′) signal except that the mixer switches are clocked by the quadrature clock (Θ_(Q) and its compliment). A quadrature clock is shifted 90° degrees from the in-phase clock.

FIG. 6b illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of the invention. A quadrature oscillator generates four equally displaced clock phases: Θ_(I), Θ _(I), Θ_(Q) and Θ _(Q) at 0°, 180°, 90° and 270°, respectively. The clocks Θ_(I) and Θ _(I) are the in-phase and inverse in-phase clocks while the Θ_(Q) and Θ _(Q) are known as the quadrature and inverse quadrature clocks. The load on each of these clock nodes is identical insuring that the clock output is evenly loaded, thereby preventing any skew between these clock signals from developing. The LNA outputs are applied to common nodes 6-3 and 6-4 of the upper and lower mixer switches. The LNA feeds the amplified signal from a source through the LNA to the coupling capacitor C_(coup). The capacitor C_(coup) couples the output signal of the LNA to the common nodes 6-3 and 6-4 of the two mixer switches. Since the upper mixer switch is clocked by the in-phase clocks, only the in-phase current component I_(I) is converted into if_(Iout) and since the lower mixer switch is clocked by the quadrature-phase clocks, only the quadrature-phase current component I_(Q) is converted into if_(Qout).

FIG. 7a depicts the device configuration for the block diagram given in FIG. 6b . The top mixer switch of FIG. 6b is on the left side of FIG. 7a and comprises MOS devices M₂₄ and M₂₅ connected to the common node 6-3 while the lower mixer of FIG. 6b is on the right side of FIG. 7a comprises MOS devices M₂₆ and M₂₇ connected to the common node 6-4. A voltage divider is formed by resistors R₁₅ and R₁₆ and is coupled through a large value resistor R₁₇ to provide DC biasing for the common nodes 6-3 and 6-4 of the left and right mixer switches and to the common plate electrode of the coupling capacitor C_(coup).

The output of the LNA is coupled to a coupling capacitor C_(coup). The coupling capacitor applies the average currents I_(I) and I_(Q) to the common nodes of the left 6-3 and right 6-4 mixer switches, respectively. Note that instead of applying the output signal of the LNA to the gate devices of the Gilbert mixer, for example see M_(g1) or M_(g2) in FIG. 6a , the signal is instead applied to the common nodes 6-3 and 6-4 of the left and right mixer switches as illustrated in FIG. 7a . Unlike the Gilbert mixer, this embodiment of mixer switches is driven by the average AC current output of the LNA to power the inventive mixer. The mixer switch M₂₅ clocked by the one of the quadrature clocks and the load capacitance of the mixer switch M₂₅ is the gate capacitance of M₂₃ which together form a switched capacitor circuit. The switched capacitor presents a load resistive to the resonant circuit of the LNA according to R_(L)=1/((C_(M23))(f_(Θ))) where R_(L) is the load resistance placed in parallel to the resonant circuit, C_(M23) is the capacitance of the load device M₂₃ and f_(Θ) is the frequency of the quadrature clock. This resistance R_(L) can be used to de-Q's or increase the bandwidth of the tank circuit in the LNA.

The signal of interest exists over a given range of frequencies and the information carried by the input signal is embedded within the signal spectrum. The left mixer comprises devices M₂₁-M₂₅ and M_(b5) and resistors R₁₁ and R₁₂. The mixer switches M₂₅ and M₂₄ are enabled and disabled by two of the quadrature clock signals Θ_(I) and Θ _(I). A mixer switch is equivalent to a switched capacitor circuit where the switch is driven by the clock signal to charge and discharge the gate capacitance (M₂₂, M₂₃) of the differential amplifier with remaining components M₂₁, R₁₁ and R₁₂. The average current I_(I) charges/discharges the gate capacitance of M₂₂ and M₂₃ whenever the clock signals Θ _(I) and Θ _(I) enable the mixer switch gates M₂₅ and M₂₄. The gate capacitance of M₂₂ and M₂₃ integrate the current I_(I) to generate a first and a second voltage applied to the differential amplifier. The differential amplifier requires two signals: an input signal and a compliment (or inverse) input signal and generates an output signal and a compliment output signal. In addition, the impedance of the switched capacitance circuit of the mixer is used to de-Q the resonant circuit, thereby achieving a broader bandwidth with acceptable gain. As the resistance of the resonant circuit decreases, the Q decreases and the bandwidth increases. The device M_(b5) and M₂₁ from a current mirror controlled by I_(b1) that feeds current into the differential amplifier comprising M₂₁, M₂₂, M₂₃, R₁₁ and R₁₂ which amplifies the output of the I_(I) signal mixed by Θ_(I) and Θ _(I) to generate the if_(Iout) outputs. The outputs of if_(Iout) are extracted just above these two resistors R₁₁ and R₁₂.

Similarly, the right mixer comprises devices M₂₆-M₃₀ and M_(b6) and resistors R₁₃ and R₁₄. The mixer switches M₂₆ and M₂₇ are enabled and disabled by two of the quadrature clock signals Θ_(Q) and Θ _(Q). The current I_(Q) charges/discharges the gate capacitance of M₂₉ and M₃₀ whenever the clock signals Θ_(Q) and Θ _(Q) enables the gates M₂₆ and M₂₇. The device M_(b6) and M₂₈ from a current mirror controlled by I_(b2) that feeds current into the differential amplifier comprising M₂₈, M₂₉, M₃₀, R₁₃ and R₁₄ which amplifies the output of the I_(Q) signal mixed by Θ_(Q) and Θ _(Q) to generate the if_(Qout) outputs. The outputs of if_(Qout) are extracted just above these two resistors R₁₃ and R₁₄.

FIG. 7b provides the measured result of the common source LNA and the switched capacitor driven mixer. The measured maximum gain of the front end of the WiGig receiver suffices the required specifications. Instead of using the constant parasitic capacitive load in the simulation models for the results provided in FIGS. 5a-d , the measured results provided in FIG. 7b corresponds to the dynamic parasitic capacitive load of the mixer being mixed with the local quadrature oscillators. In particular, note that within the range of allowed bandwidth (57-64 GHz), the gain of the front end remains within 3.2 dB of the maximum gain at 63 GHz.

FIG. 8a presents the top die view of the layout of the common source LNA, the inductors and the mixer. Referring to FIG. 4a , the source of the input signal (in₅) arrives at the top on metal 8 layer. The metal 8 layer is patterned into a spiral inductor L₁₄. At the end of inductor L₁₄ a via connects to a metal 7 layer. The metal 7 layer couples to a via stack and provides the signal to the gate of device M₈. The drain of device M₈ is couple through another via stack to the metal 8 layer forming L₁₃. The other end of L₁₃ is coupled to VSS. Note that there is mutual magnetic coupling between the inductors L₁₄ and L₁₃. The peaking inductor L₁₆ formed in the metal 8 layer couples and band pass filters the signal at the drain of M₈ to the source of M₇. The gate of M₇ is coupled to VDD (not shown) while the drain couples to the inductor L₁₅ formed in the metal 8 layer. The other end of L₁₅ is coupled to a via to the metal 7 layer and connects to VDD. The drain of M₇ is also coupled to one plate of the coupling capacitor C_(coup) formed in the metal 8 layer. Beneath this metal 8 layer is a metal 7 layer forming the lower plate of the coupling capacitor C_(coup) and the lower plate is coupled to the two mixers as shown in FIG. 7a . The view along the cut A-A′ is presented in FIG. 8b . The top metal 8 layer forms one plate of the capacitor and is separated by oxide from the lower metal 7 layer forming the other plate of the capacitor C_(coup).

FIG. 8c illustrates a cross-sectional view of a via stack within a die with eight metal layers. A via stack also known as a stacked via, stacked plug, or stacked contact is illustrated in FIG. 8c . The via between different metal layers are placed over the via of the lower layers to save on area. However, as one progresses from poly to metal 1 to metal 2 and up to metal 8, the vias, for example 8-1 and 8-3, increase in diameter. Each via, for instance, the via 8-1 and the metal 1 layer 8-2 introduce contact resistance and inductance. The via 8-3 and metal 5 layer 8-4 also introduce contact resistance and resistance into the path. The via stack can be tapped to introduce/extract a signal into/out of the stack or alter the parasitics in a circuit. The tapping occurs when a metal layer is extended from the stack and this location is called a tap point. Typically, the top metals in a technology are significantly thicker than any of the lower layer metals. The dielectric layers surround the vias and the metal segments M₂, M₃, etc. and each one of these dielectric layers is approximately 0.5 μm thick. The metal 1 through metal 7 layers are also about 0.5 μm thick while the metal 8 layer can be over 1 μm thick. The height of these via stacks is about 3 to 4 μm.

Finally, it is understood that the above description are only illustrative of the principle of the current invention. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the sprit and scope of the invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that the disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the arts. It is understood that the various embodiments of the invention, although different, are not mutually exclusive. In accordance with these principles, those skilled in the art may devise numerous modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Although the circuits were described using CMOS, the same circuit techniques can be applied to depletion mode devices and BJT or biploar circuits, since this technology allows the formation of current sources and source followers. When a device is specified, the device can be a transistor such as an N-MOS or P-MOS. The CMOS or SOI (Silicon on Insulator) technology provides two enhancement mode channel types: N-MOS (n-channel) and P-MOS (p-channel) devices or transistors. The via stacks can be fabricated using tungsten or copper. In addition, a network and a portable system can exchange information wirelessly by using communication techniques such as TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access), FDMA (Frequency Division Multiple Access), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access), OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing), UWB (Ultra Wide Band), WiFi, WiGig, Bluetooth, etc. The network can comprise the phone network, IP (Internet protocol) network, LAN (Local Area Network), ad hoc networks, local routers and even other portable systems. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A common-source Low Noise Amplifier (LNA), comprising: a first spiral inductor coupled to a source of a first transistor; a second spiral inductor coupled to a drain of a second transistor; and a third inductor connecting the first transistor to the second transistor, wherein the first spiral inductor is configurable to enable a first capacitance to be coupled in parallel to form a resonant circuit.
 2. The common-source LNA of claim 1, wherein the third inductor is configurable to enable a second capacitance to be coupled in parallel to form a bandpass filter.
 3. The common-source LNA of claim 1, wherein the resonant circuit oscillates at a lower frequency than a center frequency when a width of the second transistor is less than a width of the first transistor.
 4. The common-source LNA of claim 1, wherein the resonant circuit oscillates at a higher frequency than a center frequency when a width of the second transistor is greater than a width of the first transistor.
 5. The common-source LNA of claim 1, further comprising: a drain of a third transistor coupled to a gate of a fourth transistor with a first width; a source of the third transistor configured to be coupled to the resonant circuit; and an oscillator clock configured to operate at a first frequency that enables the third transistor, wherein the third transistor presents a first impedance to the resonant circuit, causing the resonant circuit to have a first bandwidth.
 6. The common-source LNA of claim 5, wherein the resonant circuit has a wider bandwidth than the first bandwidth when either a frequency of the oscillator clock is larger than the first frequency, a width of the fourth transistor is larger than the first width, or both are increased simultaneously.
 7. The common-source LNA of claim 5, wherein the resonant circuit has a narrower bandwidth than the first bandwidth when either a frequency of the oscillator clock is less than the first frequency, a width of the fourth transistor is less than the first width, or both are decreased simultaneously.
 8. A method for making a common-source LNA, comprising: coupling a first spiral inductor to a source of a first transistor; coupling a second spiral inductor to a drain of a second transistor; connecting a third inductor between the first transistor and the second transistor; and configuring the first spiral inductor to enable coupling a first capacitance in parallel, thereby forming a resonant circuit.
 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: configuring the third inductor to enable coupling a second capacitance in parallel, thereby forming a bandpass filter.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the resonant circuit oscillates at a lower frequency than a center frequency when a width of the second transistor is less than a width of the first transistor.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the resonant circuit oscillates at a higher frequency than a center frequency when a width of the second transistor is greater than a width of the first transistor.
 12. The method of claim 8, further comprising: coupling a drain of a third transistor to a gate of a fourth transistor with a first width; coupling a source of the third transistor to the resonant circuit; configuring an oscillator clock to operate at a first frequency to enable the third transistor; and presenting a first impedance of the third transistor to the resonant circuit, causing the resonant circuit to have a first bandwidth.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the resonant circuit has a wider bandwidth than the first bandwidth when either a frequency of the oscillator clock is larger than the first frequency, a width of the fourth transistor is larger than the first width, or both are increased simultaneously.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the resonate circuit has a narrower bandwidth than the first bandwidth when either a frequency of the oscillator clock is less than the first frequency, a width of the fourth transistor is less than the first width, or both are decreased simultaneously.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein energy from the resonant circuit is used to charge the gate of the fourth transistor. 